Talking is not easy — it is a big responsibility. You can shift the role of the language of the meeting to another or to the agenda item on the agenda item. It is also useful to have two spokes, one presenting the views and proposals of his small group, the other to take notes on what the other groups have to say. This helps ensure that ideas are not lost or misrepresered in the transmission between small groups and the spokespersons` council. Spokesperson`s advice requires good support from a team of at least three moderators, who work well together and are competent in summarizing proposals. Be careful to question someone or ask them to prove themselves – the goal is to help them get their message across and not tear it up! To give the person as much control as possible over what they want to convey, ask unanswered questions that do not have a yes/no answer. Like what. “How do you feel about that?” or “Can you explain why you`re worried?” etc. Pros and cons: list the pros and cons of each idea and compare the results. A tool like this helps people criticize each other`s ideas in a way that is not overly personalized. It can also show that what one person sees as a disadvantage, someone else thinks, is a good thing.
This is useful information about what the group disagrees with and you can draw attention to a useful new discussion! A third and most important drawback in considering that certain objections would not block consensus is the impact this would have on the contracting process. The very purpose of the consensus process was to ensure that negotiators see all states for as long as possible. The procedure was initiated to change the likelihood that the views of some states would be ignored simply because those states were in the minority or did not have voting rights. Consensus means that negotiators must do their best to ensure that the treaty texts reflect the views of the broadest possible group of states. One can only assume that some contracts would have been different if the consensus procedure had not been adopted. If it were clear that the objections of some States could be fine-questioned, the negotiators might have been tempted not to care as much. Give people time to challenge the proposal and what it means to them. If this is a complex or emotional problem, set up some time to think or pause before starting the test on agreement. The second example clearly shows what you want, but it also recognizes that Angus also has a choice on the merits! Make the final proposal clear and see if everyone fully understands what is being proposed. Does everyone understand the same thing? If it has been written and then modified, you may need to rewrite it for clarity! In this manual you will find a lot of information that will help you make decisions with consensus, including why you could use it, the basic principles and processes that you can apply to larger groups of people and ideas to deal with common problems. We also have a short consensus guide, and our guide to facilitating meetings contains many tips for smooth consensus meetings.
Moderator: “Let`s gather different ideas about what we could do, and then decide if we want to continue with one of them.” Multilateral diplomacy is sometimes complicated. It can be difficult to get dozens or hundreds of Member States to agree on a text. Over time, different avenues of agreement have emerged in the practice of the United Nations bodies. Some of the ways in which resolutions and decisions can be adopted are: before starting to make decisions, it is worth asking whether consensus is the right process for this particular subject. In an emergency, for example, appointing temporary managers or an emergency group may be the wisest approach.